The Significance of Casement’s Putamayo Journal, 1910
Roger Casement's Journal, coupled with the oral testimonies he recorded during his interviews with the Barbadian overseers, serve as important evidence in the analysis of Europe's imperial "Heart of Darkness".
The concept of land rights remains
fundamental to the future stability of all Latin American countries, but
the crucial flashpoint areas are Brazil, Peru, Venezuela and Columbia.
In Brazil, the Movimento Sem-Terra (MST), which demands fundamental
agrarian reforms, has much in common with Casement's analysis of land
rights back in 1910. Casement's Putumayo Journal, with its forthright
defence of the culture and assertion of the true history of Amerindian
tribal culture in its continuing struggle for its land, resources,
history and identity, has enduring value as a first hand account of the
crimes committed against indigenous peoples in the Putumayo region of
Columbia/Peru. [1]
Roger Casement's Journal, coupled with the oral testimonies he recorded during his interviews with the Barbadian overseers, serve as important evidence in the analysis of Europe's imperial "Heart of Darkness". There is no chapter in the whole process of extermination of South America's Pre-Columbian tribal life recorded in so much depth of detail, and is a fitting continuation of the writings of the 16th-century Spanish monk Bartolome de las Casas.
The Putumayo voyage marked a definite
turning-point in Casement's political outlook, and the tone in the
journal marks this shift. Instead of being the standard account of an
imperial adventurer, it becomes the sustained record of an anti-imperial
investigator. At the outset of the voyage Casement spends time
comparing the superiority of British imperial methods to those of the
Spanish and Portuguese; by the time of his return downriver, he is
moving toward the insight that commerce and international trade are in
themselves the instruments of imperialism. [2]
In order to implement the $7.5 billion Plan, Colombia is asking for $3.5 billion in international aid to supplement $4 billion of its own funding. Little of this international aid has been realized, however, and it is still unclear just how the debt-ridden Colombian Government is going to raise the remaining $4 billion.
According to the Plan, the initial objective is for the state to gain
control of the entire country, some 40 % of which is currently
controlled by guerrilla forces. It intends to achieve this goal by
launching a military offensive against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of
Colombia (FARC) in southern Colombia, while at the same time
eradicating the coca crops that are grown in that region. Following the
military phase, peasant farmers whose coca crops have been eradicated
will be offered funding for alternative crops and aid will be made
available to those campesinos forced to flee their homes and their land.
[6]
[7]
However, in the case of Ireland, the
privatization, or hand-over, took place despite real alternatives for
partership with oil-producing states (Norway and Iraq), and awareness of
considerable hydrocarbon potential in Irish waters.
Footnotes
(1) The Amazon Journal of Roger Casement, Ed. Angus Mitchell, Lilliput Press (Dublin, 1997), p. 52
(2) Ibid, p.53.
(3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putumayo_Department
(4) https://columbia.thefreedictionary.com/Putumayo+Department
(5) https://209.15.138.224/colombia_maps/m_Putumayox.htm
(6) https://www.cs.org/publications/CSQ/csq-article.cfm?id=1354
(7) https://eatthestate.org/05-23/PlanColumbiaAndean.htm
NB: as these links are almost 20 years old, they may not be current.
© The Tara Foundation, 2006