Andrew McGrath
On
1st November 2005, the Government released a ten-year transport plan.
Titled "Transport 21", it outlined a €34.4 billion spend on road, rail
and light rail projects across the country.
As part of this programme,
it was announced that the Western Rail Corridor would be re-opened in
two phases, starting with the Ennis-Claremorris section and followed by
the Claremorris-Collooney section. If one were to go only by the media
reports greeting this announcement, one would have been left with the
impression that the money allocated was extra investment, and that the
projects it was intended to fund were all new initiatives.
However this
was not so. The electoral confidence trick played here by the Government
was to include monies already allotted to road programmes and to
reannounce programmes already planned for. The plan itself is
suspiciously lacking in actual detail regarding the costing of
individual projects, and this is no surprise given the ever-ballooning
road-building bonanza that is being enjoyed by contractors, and the
land-rezoning holiday that goes with it. The inevitable cost increases
and delays do not feature in the plan, strengthening the contention that
it consists mainly of pie in the sky.
Regarding
the Western Rail Corridor element itself, which was such a prominent
feature of Government PR in promoting the plan in the media, it forms a
part of the campaign on the part of the State to ensure the economic
isolation of the West of Ireland. For instance, as the Sligo Champion
pointed out in response to the announcement, "[t]he Western Rail
Corridor is the only project in the ten-year plan that could have been
started relatively soon. Here was an ideal opportunity for the
government to show some serious commitment to the West and North West by
getting on with the rail project. Instead, it will be spread
interminably over ten years… The section of track between Claremorris
and Collooney will be preserved in mothballs – but nobody is taking bets
on whether a train will ever use it.
Many people in the West are also
puzzled by the ten-year timeframe put forward for achieving the
Ennis-Claremorris section of just 68.5 miles, considering the 26 miles
from Ennis to Limerick was renewed in eighteen months. And there is the
question of whether massive EU funding will be lost to the project
because of the delay." In the meantime, the bulk of the spending
earmarked in the programme is concentrated around Dublin, in an attempt
not to bail out the sinking ship of infrastructure and housing
development, but to rescue the Government's chances among the electorate
in the region of greatest population density.
In
fact, the loss of EU infrastructure funding is no longer a question, it
is a certainty.
Here is an extract from a speech by Minister for
Finance Brian Cowen on the 17th of July 2006 to the Fianna Fáil
Parliamentary Party: "I want to emphasize that Ireland will draw down
its full entitlements under the Structural Funds for each region. This
means that investments will continue to take place under the current
programme beyond 2006 in both regions. Under the Structural Fund
Regulations, expenditure on co-funded measures can continue to the end
of December 2008 and will be eligible for the drawdown of structural
funds from the 2000-2006 allocation. Not only will the available funding
be drawn down but, as attested by independent assessors, the results
achieved with the resources from the structural funds has been good."
Under the EU Structural Funds, the Government would be able to claim up
to 70% (over €270 million) of the cost of the Western Rail Corridor,
provided an application is made before the end of 2006.
However,
a spokesperson for the Department of Finance stated on 17th July, on
the same day the Minister made his speech, that there was no intention
to apply for EU funding for the project. If the Western Rail Corridor is
to proceed at all, it must be funded in full by the exchequer. But the
refusal of the Government even to apply for funds demonstrates that
their commitment to providing a rail infrastructure for the West of
Ireland is hollow. What with the endless capacity for taxpayer-funded
expansion in the civil engineering, i.e. road-building, sector, there is
no prospect that the Government will meet its commitments under
Transport 21, and no reason to believe that there was any intention to
do so.
© The Tara Foundation, 2006